Cover of Mind and Cosmos

Book · 2012 · Philosophy

Mind and Cosmos

Why the Materialist Neo-Darwinian Conception of Nature Is Almost Certainly False

by Thomas Nagel · Recommended by 4 people on 7 podcasts

mentions
8
people
4
podcasts
7
episodes
7
recommendations
3

We earn a commission if you buy through the store links below, at no cost to you.

A book by called Mind and Cosmos by Thomas Nagel who's a famous philosopher not religious but arguing for the fundamental limits and problems with a materialist framework on the world and it is a very short book which is why I don't hesitate to recommend it.
Ross Douthat · The Ezra Klein Show · Apr 2025 Listen at 1:37:50

What they say about it

Grouped from 8 mentions
  • Limits of materialist framework“fundamental limits and problems with a materialist framework”
    3
  • Teleological view of evolution“defended the idea of what he called teleological laws”
    2

The best things said about it

5 of 8 · every mention
Recommended
A book called Mind and Cosmos by Thomas Nagel was a famous philosopher not religious but arguing for the fundamental limits and problems with a materialist framework on the world and it is a very short book.
Ross Douthat Interesting Times · Aug 2025
Discussed
Thomas Nagel wrote his book Mind and the Cosmos. You're familiar with this, I'm sure. You know, why the neo-Darwinian materialistic view of the world is almost certainly false.
On the show The Diary Of A CEO with Steven Bartlett · Sep 2025
Discussed
A similar book was written more than 10 years ago 15 years ago nearly by the p great philosopher Thomas Nagel yes Mr. bat called Mind and Cosmos and he got absolutely destroyed in reviews.
Philip Goff The Tim Ferriss Show · Apr 2025
Discussed
He had this book in 2012 Mind and Cosmos where he defended the idea of what he called teleological laws.
Philip Goff The Rich Roll Podcast · Mar 2023
Discussed
My colleague here at NYU Tom Nagel wrote a book called Mind and Cosmos a few years ago where we are for this teleological view of evolution toward consciousness saying this let the problems for Darwinism.
David Chalmers Lex Fridman Podcast · Jan 2020

Where and when it comes up

Mentions per year

Counted mentions by episode date. Our archive is deeper for recent years.

How it comes up

Recommended means the speaker tells listeners to read it.

Most mentions, by podcast

7 shows

4 people who brought it up

Most recommendations first

Why people recommend it

Mind and Cosmos by Thomas Nagel is a concise philosophical work by a prominent non-religious thinker that challenges the fundamental limits, assumptions, and problems of a strictly materialist framework on the world. On Interesting Times and The Ezra Klein Show, Ross Douthat recommended the book to listeners interested in consciousness and alternative perspectives on evolution, praising it as a short and accessible critique of materialism. In discussions on other podcasts, such as The Diary Of A CEO with Steven Bartlett, the host noted how the book argues that the neo-Darwinian materialistic view of reality is almost certainly false. Furthermore, Philip Goff discussed the text on both The Tim Ferriss Show and The Rich Roll Podcast, observing that the author defended the concept of teleological laws and purpose in evolution, though the book faced intense criticism in academic reviews. David Chalmers also mentioned the work on the Lex Fridman Podcast, noting that his colleague at NYU argued for a teleological view of evolution toward consciousness that creates significant problems for traditional Darwinism. Frank Turek similarly brought up the book on The Rubin Report to examine atheist critiques of materialism.

Every mention

8 counted mentions
Ross Douthat um but a book called Mind and Cosmos by Thomas Nagel was a famous philosopher not religious but arguing for… 3
Recommended
“um but a book called Mind and Cosmos by Thomas Nagel was a famous philosopher not religious but arguing for the fundamental limits and problems with a materialist framework on the world and it is a very short book”
Recommended
“Um but a book by called Mind and Cosmos by Thomas Nagel who's a famous philosopher not religious but arguing for the fundamental limits and problems with a materialist framework on the world and it is a very short book which is why I don't hesitate to recommend it.”
Recommended
“a book by called Mind and Cosmos by Thomas Nagel who's a famous philosopher not religious but arguing for the fundamental limits and problems with a materialist framework on the world”
Philip Goff a similar book was written more than 10 years ago 15 years ago nearly by the p great philosopher Thomas Nag… 2
Discussed
“a similar book was written more than 10 years ago 15 years ago nearly by the p great philosopher Thomas Nagel yes Mr. bat called Mind and Cosmos and he got absolutely destroyed in reviews.”
Discussed
“he had this book in 2012 um mind and Cosmos where he defended the idea of what he called teleological laws”
David Chalmers actually my colleague here at NYU Tom Nagel wrote a book called mind and cosmos a few years ago where we ar… 1
Discussed
“actually my colleague here at NYU Tom Nagel wrote a book called mind and cosmos a few years ago where we are for this teleological view of evolution toward consciousness saying this let the problems for Darwinism”
Frank Turek In fact, Thomas Nagle, who I think John Lennox mentioned in your dialogue with him, he's an NYU professor,… 1
Discussed
“In fact, Thomas Nagle, who I think John Lennox mentioned in your dialogue with him, he's an NYU professor, wrote a book about 12 years ago called "Mind and Cosmos" where he said, even though he's an atheist, he said, I'm trying to remember the subtitle.”
Mentioned on the show without a named speaker1
Discussed
“Thomas Nagel wrote his book Mind and the Cosmos. You're familiar with this, I'm sure. You know, why the neo-Darwinian materialistic view of the world is almost certainly false.”

Also mentioned in the same episodes

Portraits from Wikimedia Commons: Philip Goff, Art Uncut / Wikimedia Commons (CC BY-SA 4.0); Frank Turek, Gage Skidmore / Wikimedia Commons (CC BY-SA 4.0).